Legal Opinion

Gee v. Gee

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1901No. Nos. 12,707—(62)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover upon a judgment against defendant docketed in said court. The action was tried before Dibell, J., who found in favor of defendant. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Plaintiff and defendant formed a partnership on July 30, 1896, for the purpose of buying and selling grain on commission. Plaintiff was to give no attention to the business. Defendant was personally to conduct the same, and receive sixty dollars per month therefor. Such connection continued until January 7, following, when it was dissolved by mutual consent. Thereafter an action was brought by plaintiff against his partner for an accounting, which was submitted to a referee. The referee heard the evidence, and made findings on which judgment was ordered against the defendant for a substantial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hennequin v. ClewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Noble v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Palmer v. . HusseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. In re RhutasselDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Blashke v. Standard (In Re Standard)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1991
  2. Morgan v. American Fidelity Fire Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  3. American Surety Co. of New York v. GreenwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  4. Inge v. StillwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Karger v. OrthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API