Legal Opinion
Then v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 3, 2001No. 00 CIV. 6520(DC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHIN, District Judge.
Pro se petitioner Angel Alberto Then petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. In its response to the petition, the Government argues only that Then filed his petition after the one-year statute of limitations for section 2255 petitions had expired. Because I find that Then’s petition was timely filed, the Government is ordered to address the merits of the petition.
BACKGROUND
On October 24, 1995, a jury convicted Then of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alixcair Valverde v. James Stinson, Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Fac.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Randall Gendron v. United States of America, Randall Gendron v. United States of America, James P. Glass v. Rodney J. AhitowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Rhodes v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Baskin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- German v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- DeFeo v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001