Legal Opinion

DeFeo v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 25, 2001No. 99 CIV 9094 RWSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Petitioner Frank John DeFeo (“DeFeo”) has moved to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the grounds that the attorney who represented him in a Rule 33 motion was ineffective, and that the Honorable Mary Johnson Lowe 1 erred in making sentencing findings as to the amount of narcotics involved under the United States Sentencing Guidelines by a preponderance of the evidence, rather than beyond a reasonable doubt, pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. German v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Rogers v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API