Legal Opinion
Rhodes v. Senkowski
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 21, 2000No. 98 Civ. 2221(NRB)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BUCHWALD, District Judge.
Petitioner’s court-appointed counsel has filed objections to the comprehensive and well-cited Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck, which recommended the dismissal of this habeas petition on the ground that it was untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”) as it was filed after April 24, 1997 and that petitioner had not established the extraordinary circumstances that would warrant a finding of equitable tolling.
Counsel notes that he has no objection to the Court’s analysis of the law.…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Garcia v. PortuondoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Erwin v. EloDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Brown v. McKeeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Setala v. J.C. Penney Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Santiago v. Newburgh Enlarged City School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.