Hales v. Snowden
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The defendants Curtis C. and Florence E. Colyear appealed from an order made after final judgment and,from the final judgment as amended and supplemented by said order. The question presented for determination may be stated as follows: Where an appeal has been taken by two of four mortgagors of real property from a decree rendered in the foreclosure action wherein is included an allowance for attorneys’ fees and the decree is affirmed, may the trial court, subsequent to the filing therein of the remittitur, allow additional attorneys’ fees for services rendered in resisting the appeal and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hales v. SnowdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Schallert-Ganahl Lumber Co. v. NealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gralynn Laundry, Inc. v. Virginia Bond & Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Lampkin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Booker v. BookerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Citizens Bank of Windsor v. LandersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rastelli v. Zaca Mining Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Winget v. WoodsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Downey State Bank v. Major-Blakeney Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1976