Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Rainwater

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 14, 1927PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). The appellants contend that the State of Arkansas, by virtue of its sovereignty, is entitled, under the common law, to preference of its claims in this instance over and above the claims of all its citizens or subjects, and that the sureties herein, through the payment of the State’s claims and the right of subrogation resulting therefrom, are likewise entitled to the . same preference as the State of Arkansas had at the time of the payment of said claims.

The common law of England has been adopted by our State by statute, § 1432, Crawford & Moses’ Digest,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marshall v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. West Englewood Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. DodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Green v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  5. Shaw v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API