Legal Opinion

Green v. City of Homewood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1931No. 6 Div. 699PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

The Bank of Ensley, proceeding according to the provisions of chapter 25, article 8, §§ 891-905, of the Code, deposited with the state treasurer state bonds to the amount of $10,000 as.security for the faithful performance of its duties as a state depositary. As such depositary the bank was authorized to receive state funds in an amount equal to the par value of the bonds so deposited, in no case to exceed its paid-in capital stock, surplus, and undivided profits. Section 893. But “no state depositary shall receive or have at any time an amount of said money or funds in excess of the face…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Bank of Florence v. United States Savings & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Lummus Cotton Gin Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Rankin v. Madison State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. SparksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Limestone County v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. McQueen v. BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  5. Montgomery v. City of AthensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API