Shaw v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.
The State Bank of Commerce, a banking corporation incorporated under the laws of this state, was duly designated as a state depository. In compliance with the statute, it executed a depository bond, conditioned as required by law, with defendant in error as surety thereon. Subsequently this bank closed its doors because of insolvency, and was placed in the hands of the state banking commissioner for liquidation. At the time it closed, the state of Texas had on deposit the sum of $10,532.20. Defendant in error, as surety on the depository bond, upon demand, paid the state the full amount of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Matter of Carnegie Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Orem v. WrightsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
- Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. Mauritz-Wells Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
- People Ex Rel. Nelson v. West Englewood Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Huey v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. BruckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Lincoln v. RickettsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.