Ginsbarg v. Ginsbarg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed as to the first cause of action and reversed on the law as to the second cause of action, and defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the second cause of action granted, without costs. (Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74; Shonfeld v. Shonfeld, 236 App. Div. 271; Feig v. Feig, 232 id. 172.) The order allowing a counsel fee of two hundred dollars is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, there was no abuse of discretion by the Special Term in giving this allowance to plaintiff to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Jones v. . BrinsmadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Shonfeld v. ShonfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by2 opinions
- Laner v. LanerNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Abate v. AbateNew York Supreme Court · 1938