Legal Opinion

Ginsbarg v. Ginsbarg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings affirmed as to the first cause of action and reversed on the law as to the second cause of action, and defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings as to the second cause of action granted, without costs. (Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74; Shonfeld v. Shonfeld, 236 App. Div. 271; Feig v. Feig, 232 id. 172.) The order allowing a counsel fee of two hundred dollars is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, there was no abuse of discretion by the Special Term in giving this allowance to plaintiff to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Jones v. . BrinsmadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Shonfeld v. ShonfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Laner v. LanerNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Abate v. AbateNew York Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API