Legal Opinion

Shonfeld v. Shonfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

This undefended action for the annulment of a marriage is based upon the alleged fraudulent representations of the defendant, in reliance upon which the plaintiff says he was induced to enter into the marriage contract.

The parties were married in the city of New York on July 15,1930. The plaintiff testified that he had known the defendant for many years prior to their marriage; that they discussed marriage but that he had refused to marry the defendant because he was not financially able to do so; that in July, 1930, he had an opportunity to enter the jewelry business but he needed $6,000 to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Di Lorenzo v. . Di LorenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Mirizio v. MirizioNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Svenson v. . SvensonNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Klein v. WolfsohnNew York Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Gumbiner v. GumbinerNew York Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ginsbarg v. GinsbargAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Cervone v. CervoneNew York Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API