Legal Opinion

Laner v. Laner

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is an application by plaintiff for an allowance of counsel fee. The action was brought to annul the marriage between parties because of defendant’s alleged physical incapacity. The defendant interposed a counterclaim for an annulment based upon the plaintiff’s alleged physical incapacity. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff annulling the marriage “ because of the physical incapacity of the plaintiff wife and defendant husband of entering into the marriage contract with each other.” The defendant has served notice of appeal from such judgment, and the plaintiff seeks an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fox v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Lake v. . LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Jones v. . BrinsmadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Ginsbarg v. GinsbargAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bothenberg v. BothenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API