Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Herdman v. Franklin County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1993No. 93-1826PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We deny the writ for the following reasons.

In his deposition,1 relator alleges that he has, since 1985, considered his parents’ former home at 3000 High Street, Brice, Ohio, his permanent residence, even though he had married and lived with his wife, child and stepchildren in Canal Winchester, Ohio, in 1989 and 1990, and had lived in Columbus for a time in 1990. Most important, he claims continuous residence at the Brice address since October 1990. He also states that he informally separated from his wife in October 1990, that she lived with her parents thereafter until relator and his wife…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Beck v. CaseyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Spangler v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Nichols v. Vinton County Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. O'Beirne v. Geauga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Duncan v. Portage County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State ex rel. Kelly v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Stine v. Brown County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State ex rel. Varnau v. WenningerOhio Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API