Legal Opinion

State ex rel. O'Beirne v. Geauga County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1997No. 97-1411PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

Relators assert that they are entitled to the requested writ of mandamus to compel the board to place the referendum issue on the November 4 election ballot. We may vacate the decision of a board of elections and grant a writ of mandamus to compel a referendum election if relators establish that the board’s decision resulted from fraud, corruption, abuse of discretion, or clear disregard of statutes or applicable legal provisions. State ex rel. Rife v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 632, 633-634, 640 N.E.2d 522, 523-524. Relators here contend that the board abused its…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Bitter v. MissigOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Shelly & Sands, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Olen Corp. v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cooker Restaurant Corp. v. Montgomery County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Wolfe v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Columbia Reserve Ltd. v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Lorain Ordinance No. 77-01 v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. McCord v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API