Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Spangler v. Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1983No. 83-1552PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

It is well-settled that the decision of a board of elections will not be disturbed absent a showing that the decision constituted an abuse of discretion or clear disregard of applicable law. See State, ex rel. Flynn, v. Bd. of Elections (1955), 164 Ohio St. 193 [57 O.O. 402], paragraph one of the syllabus; State, ex rel. Senn, v. Bd. of Elections (1977), 51 Ohio St. 2d 173, 175 [5 O.O.3d 381]; State, ex rel. Morrison, v. Bd. of Elections (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 336, 338-339 [17 O.O.3d 420]. Thus, our review is limited to determining whether respondent’s decision that Lambros was a resident of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State ex rel. Morrison v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Cox v. Village of Union CityOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burech v. Belmont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Portis v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State ex rel. Herdman v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Portis v. Summit Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Arthur P. Lambros v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections State of Ohio Sherrod BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API