State ex rel. Spangler v. Board of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
It is well-settled that the decision of a board of elections will not be disturbed absent a showing that the decision constituted an abuse of discretion or clear disregard of applicable law. See State, ex rel. Flynn, v. Bd. of Elections (1955), 164 Ohio St. 193 [57 O.O. 402], paragraph one of the syllabus; State, ex rel. Senn, v. Bd. of Elections (1977), 51 Ohio St. 2d 173, 175 [5 O.O.3d 381]; State, ex rel. Morrison, v. Bd. of Elections (1980), 63 Ohio St. 2d 336, 338-339 [17 O.O.3d 420]. Thus, our review is limited to determining whether respondent’s decision that Lambros was a resident of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Morrison v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Cox v. Village of Union CityOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- State ex rel. Burech v. Belmont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Portis v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. Herdman v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Portis v. Summit Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Arthur P. Lambros v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections State of Ohio Sherrod BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.