Legal Opinion
Mastercard International Inc. v. Visa International Service Ass'n
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 18, 2006No. Docket Nos. 06-4433-cv (L), 06-4947-cv(CON)PublishedCited by 183 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POOLER, Circuit Judge.
Non-party movant-appellant Visa International Service Association (“Visa”) moved to dismiss the underlying action contending that it is a necessary and indispensable party under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19. Visa also moved to intervene in the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. Both motions were denied by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Preska, /.). The district court concluded that Visa was neither necessary nor indispensable to the underlying breach of contract action between plaintiff-appellee MasterCard…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Marvel Characters, Inc. v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Floyd v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Bacardi International Limited v. v. Suarez & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- School District of City of Pontiac v. Secretary of US Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Albert Alto v. Kenneth SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.