Legal Opinion

Albert Alto v. Kenneth Salazar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 26, 2013No. 12-56145PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Our question concerns the propriety of a preliminary injunction issued with regard to a dispute over membership in an Indian tribe. “ ‘[A] tribe’s right to define its own membership for tribal purposes has long been recognized as central to its existence as an independent political community.’ ” Cahto Tribe of Laytonville Rancheria v. Dutschke, 715 F.3d 1225, 1226 (9th Cir. 2013) (quoting Santa Clara, Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 72 n. 32, 98 S.Ct. 1670, 56 L.Ed.2d 106 (1978)). In view of the importance of tribal membership decisions and as part of the federal…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Rahne Pistor v. Carlos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Ryan Karnoski v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  3. Dine Citizens Against Ruining v. Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Chike Okafor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. Municipality of San JuanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API