Meridian Security Insurance Co. v. David L. Sadowski
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Meridian Security Insurance filed this action under the diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). It asked the district court to issue a declaratory judgment that it need not defend or indemnify its insured, The Rose Depot of Arlington Heights, against a claim pending in state court. Kamal Haddad, who filed that suit on behalf of a class, sought damages on account of unsolicited advertising faxes that The Rose Depot had sent to prospective customers.
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act prohibits most unsolicited commercial solicitations by facsimile and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by411 opinions
- Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Elsa Chavez v. Jpmorgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- McPhail v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Carol B. Oshana v. Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Parker v. Four Seasons Hotels, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
406 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.