United States Fidelity Etc. Co. v. More
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
By this action plaintiff seeks to recover of the defendant the sum of $1964.41, with interest, damages, and counsel fees, alleged to be due on an indemnity contract given by defendant to plaintiff in consideration of the execution by plaintiff of a stay-bond on appeal in the replevin suit of Churchill v. More, 4 Cal. App. 219, [88 Pac. 290]. For the facts of the litigation, reference may be had to Churchill v. More, supra; Churchill v. More, 7 Cal. App. 767, [96 Pac. 108]; and More v. Churchill, ante, p. 368, [101 Pac. 9]. A general demurrer was sustained to plaintiff’s complaint, and from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Churchill v. MoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Churchill v. MoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- More v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by6 opinions
- Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Schlitz v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. TerrallOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.