People v. Silva
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAURITZEN, J., *
Introduction
This appeal raises issues as to whether a bail agent of a corporate surety is entitled to bail exoneration pursuant to Penal Code section 1306 or whether he is barred from pursuing reimbursement because of a lack of standing, collection on the underlying obligation to the surety, the bar of res judicata, or the defense of laches. A careful examination of the record reveals that the bail agent is barred from recovery by the doctrine of res judicata. In addition, the People have cross-appealed from the portion of the lower court’s order denying its request for…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. Granite State InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Monarch Healthcare v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- People v. Landon White Bail BondsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- City of Santa Paula v. NarulaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Hyundai Securities Co. v. Ik Chi LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.