Legal Opinion

State v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 25, 2016No. 106409PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.;

Defendant Michael Jordan appeals his conviction of felony theft by deception, arguing that the compulsory joinder rule of K.S.A. 21-3108(2)(a) barred his prosecution. We affirm Jordans conviction.

Factual and Procedural Background

The State charged Jordan in two separate cases for conduct occurring in April 2010.

That month Jordan contacted Joshua Smith about a Mercedes he had for sale. Smith gave Jordan a key so that Jordan could take the car for a test drive, and Jordan never returned. Smith reported the car stolen.

Nine days later, Jordan was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. ComanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. HambrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. McCullough v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. State v. SimsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. State v. BrosseitSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API