Legal Opinion

Allen v. Blyth

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1933No. 24147. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of John Saad, who is the real party in interest, brought this action to recover damages by reason of delay in the delivery of corporate stock which Saad had purchased through or from the defendants. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $3,600. The defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative, for a new trial; both of which motions being overruled, they appeal from the judgment entered upon the verdict.

The facts are these: The appellants are copartners doing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Duel v. HollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Rovegno v. San Jose Knights of Columbus Hall Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Thompson-Spencer Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Idaho Trust Co. v. EastmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Dignan v. SpurrWashington Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Gooschin v. LaddWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Shearson Loeb Rhoades, Inc. v. MedlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Braseth v. FarrellWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Peters v. Richwell Resources, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API