Legal Opinion

Dignan v. Spurr

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1891No. 303PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Cowrt, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Anders, O. J.

The respondent brought this action against appellant to recover damages for an alleged breach of a contract in writing, which is as follows:

“This agreement, made and entered into this 19th day of November, A. D. 1889, by and between James Dignan, of the city of Seattle, King county, State of Washington, party of the first part, and James Spurr, of the same place, the party of the second part:
“Witnesseth, That for and in consideration of the covenants and agreements on the part of said party of the *310second part hereinafter set forth and…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Garfield & Proctor Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Bamberger Bros. v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Redlands Orange Growers' Ass'n v. GormanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Redlands Orange Growers Ass'n v. GormanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Allen v. BlythWashington Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API