Legal Opinion
Skaggs v. Horrall
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1948No. Civ. 16311PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Subdivision 16 of section 202, article XIX, of the charter of the city of Los Angeles provides that when a request “to be reheard” has been filed by a police officer who has been removed from the police department after hearing before a board of rights, “The Chief of Police must consider and decide upon such request . . .,” and that “If good reason or cause appears therefor, the Chief of Police must, without unnecessary delay, cause a Board of Rights to be constituted . . . for the purpose of hearing and deciding upon the matter.”
Petitioner was dismissed following a hearing before…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ludolph v. Board of Police CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Kavanaugh v. PaullSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935
- Cope v. SteckelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Skaggs v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Miami v. KellumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Litzius v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Barr v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Kendall v. City of Fort PierceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.