Legal Opinion

Litzius v. Whitmore

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1970No. Civ. 26548PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELKINGTON, J.

In this proceeding against the County of San Mateo and Earl B. Whitmore, its sheriff, a judgment of dismissal was entered following the election of plaintiff William F. Litzius not to amend his petition for writ of mandate upon the sustaining of a general demurrer thereto, with leave to amend. Litzius appeals from the judgment of dismissal.

The facts we shall relate are as they appear in the petition for mandate.

Litzius was an employee, with civil service status, of the City and County of San Francisco. His job classification was “Airport Security Officer”; his duties were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. McShannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HulburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Abbate v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API