Sentry Insurance v. Davison Fuel & Dock Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
The question presented by this case concerns the limitations, if any, on the recovery by a surety against its principal for attorney fees and expenses by the surety’s retained counsel in connection with a claim asserted by the obligor on the bond against both surety and principal, when the agreement between the surety and principal contains the following indemnification agreement:
“[The principal agrees] to indemnify and keep indemnified the [surety] from and against any liability, and all loss, costs, charges, suits, damages, counsel fees and expenses of whatever kind or nature which [the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Central Towers Apartments, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. BallardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FalkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Kilgore v. Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ideal Electronic Security Co. v. International Fidelity InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Fallon Electric Co., Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, Third-Party v. Ravin, Inc. Ralph P. Murovich Darlene A. Murovich, Third-Party Appeal of the Cincinnati Insurance Company, No. 96-3559. Corey Food Service Equipment, Inc. v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, Third-Party v. Ravin, Inc. Ralph P. Murovich Darlene A. Murovich, Third-Party Appeal of the Cincinnati Insurance Company, No. 96-3559Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Perkins v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Gulf Insurance v. AMSCO, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Fallon Electric Co. v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.