Legal Opinion
Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1982No. Nos. 80-3180, 80-3217PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
This is the third time this private antitrust action involving the sale and installation of grave markers has come before this court. We conclude that the district court’s decision on the installation tying claim is contrary to the law of the case and that the awards for damages and attorney fees were based on improper considerations without support in the record. Accordingly, for the third time, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
Background
The action began in 1969 when Eugene Granite & Marble Works (EGM), Oregon’s oldest retailer and installer of grave…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Nachwalter v. ChristieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Michael Paul HouserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Harriet M. Gould, an Unremarried Widow v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Frederick Hoptowit v. John SpellmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.