Frederick Hoptowit v. John Spellman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
This is the second appeal in this case. In the prior appeal, Hoptowit v. Ray, 9 Cir., 1982, 682 F.2d 1237 (Hoptowit I), we affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings. Our decision in Hoptowit I is the law of the case, see Planned Parenthood of Central and Northern Arizona v. Arizona, 9 Cir., 1983, 718 F.2d 938, 949; Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews & Co., 9 Cir., 1982, 682 F.2d 830, 833-35, and we are required to follow it, absent special considerations that are not present here. In this opinion we assume that the reader is familiar with our…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Mayor of Philadelphia v. Educational Equality LeagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Morgan v. MorgensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Junior Ray Duckworth, Cross-Appellants v. Gayle Franzen, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.