Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. Thermatex Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 17, 1988No. C86-663YPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

BATCHELDER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendants Thermatex Corp. (Thermatex) and Allied Industrial Workers of America, AFL-CIO 621 (Union) for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Upon a thorough review of the motions, the memoranda of the parties, depositions, exhibits, affidavits, and the applicable law, the Court finds that the motions for summary judgment are well taken and therefore must be granted.

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS

Plaintiff alleges that Thermatex violated § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dobrski v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  2. Robinson v. UAW LOCAL 1196District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API