Legal Opinion
Dobrski v. Ford Motor Company
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 16, 2010No. Case 09-CV-963PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
KATHLEEN McDONALD O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Ford Motor Company’s (“Ford”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 5.) This Motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons articulated below, Ford’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
The following facts are taken from Plaintiffs Complaint and are accepted as true, as they must be in the context of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.
1. Dobrski’s Employment with Ford Motor Company
From…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Embassy Realty Investment, LLC v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Redding v. United States Parachute Assn., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Ehrlich v. KovackDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Darden v. Montgomery County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Pierce v. Schwebel Baking CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025