Legal Opinion
Robinson v. UAW LOCAL 1196
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 31, 1995No. 1:90-CV-1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
O’MALLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carol Robinson originally brought this “hybrid § 301/fair representation” case against both her ex-employer, Central Brass Manufacturing Company (“Central Brass”), and her union, Local 1196 of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (“the Union”). Robinson claimed that she had been discharged improperly from Central Brass for absenteeism, and further claimed that the Union had breached its duty to represent her fairly in the grievance process.
During earlier proceedings in this ease,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dudich v. United Auto Workers Local, Union No. 1250District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006