Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Hoesing

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 18, 1978No. 35,054; ACM 22243; No. 35,205; CM 435996PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*356Opinion of the Court

COOK, Judge:

Among other offenses, appellant Hoesing was convicted by a general court-martial of three specifications of transactions with hashish, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. Appellant Dillard was convicted by a general court-martial of possession of heroin, in violation of Article 134, supra. In both cases, the maximum imposable punishment for the offenses was computed by utilizing the punishment prescribed in the Table of Maximum Punishments 1 for a violation of Article 134.2

Both appellants challenged the validity of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CourtneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. RoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  4. United States v. PicotteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. CastnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. HaglerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  2. United States v. ThomasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. SurryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  4. United States v. ThurmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. LovingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API