Legal Opinion

Wray v. Sumerset Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 16, 1923No. 10639PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action for damages concerning some oil well supplies commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. Hereafter, for convenience, the parties will be called plaintiff and defendant, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

As we understand, from the briefs of counsel for respective parties, the principal ground relied on for reversal is that, while the plaintiff’s petition states a cause of action for damages for the conversion of personal property, the subsequent proceedings and proof conclusively show that its cause…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flegal v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  2. Chamberlain v. M'ClurgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  3. Logsdon v. HudsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Kendall v. RossiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1913
  5. Lull & Skinner Co. v. Kemmerer Vehicle Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Eagle Oil Co. v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Shawnee Hospital Authority v. Dow Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Joyner v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Eagle Oil Co. v. Sinclair Prairie Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API