Legal Opinion

Shawnee Hospital Authority v. Dow Construction, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1990No. 66960PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.

The sole question for us to answer today is whether, in this post-dismissal proceeding to enforce a settlement agreement, the trial court correctly ruled that the earlier contract’s arbitration clause is not enforceable for resolution of claims left unresolved by the settlement’s express terms? We answer in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

This appeal stems from denial of Dow Construction Inc.’s [Dow] request to compel arbitration of a latent-defect claim in connection with a hospital building project. Shawnee Hospital Authority [Hospital] and Dow entered…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Mullen v. ThaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Utica National Bank & Trust Co. v. Associated Producers Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  4. Ollie v. RainboltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Snow v. WinnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. JefferySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Whitehorse v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Allstate Insurance v. StinebaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. SMJ Gen. Constr., Inc. v. Jet Commercial Constr., LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  5. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. ASHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API