Legal Opinion

Joyner v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1927No. 20458. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against appellant in a tort action for damages, alleged to have been received by the respondent wife from negligence in the operation of one of appellant’s street cars.

The defense interposed by the appellant, and chiefly relied upon at the trial, was based upon the allegations of its affirmative answer:

“I.
“That subsequent to the filing of plaintiffs’ claim for damages, and while there existed between the parties hereto a bona fide dispute over the validity of said claim and the amount of damage sustained by plaintiffs, the plaintiffs and the defendant entered…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kromer v. . HeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Reilly v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Flegal v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Bandman v. . FinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Armstrong v. Sacramento Valley R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newsom v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Inman v. W. E. Roche Fruit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Rosen v. Ascentry Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. National Bank of Washington v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Rosen v. ASCENTRY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API