Lull & Skinner Co. v. Kemmerer Vehicle Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Poweshiek District Court. — IIoN. ByroN W. PeestoN, Judge. ActioN at law to recover damages for a breach of contract. The case was tried to the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment in favor of defendants for costs. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
The plaintiff company is a manufacturer of wagons and buggies, having its place of business at Kalamazoo, Mich., and the defendant vehicle - company is a dealer in property of such character, with its principal place of business at Magnolia, Ark. In December, 1901, these parties entered into a contract in writing by the terms of which the. 'defendant contracted to purchase of plaintiff four hundred vehicles, the same to be shipped in car lots as ordered during the early months of the following year. The vehicles contracted for are specifically described in the writing, and prices are agreed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chappedelaine v. DechenauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Roe v. McCaughanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Strader v. HaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Williams v. Casparis Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Johanik v. Des Moines Drug Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Wray v. Sumerset Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923