Mortensen v. Mortensen
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
The parties are here as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiffs filed a petition to condemn certain lands owned by defendants in order to obtain a reservoir site pursuant to C.S.A. ’53, 147-5-1, et seq. The procedure in Eminent Domain was strictly followed as provided in C.S.A. ’53, 50-1. A commission of three freeholders was appointed to determine the necessity for the taking. They examined the site and heard the testimony of witnesses and reported to the court that “the taking of the proposed land for the reservoir site is not necessary.” The trial court accepted the report and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pine Martin Mining Co. v. Empire Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Gibson v. CannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
- Schneider v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Haver v. MatonockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- Warner v. Town of GunnisonColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Jagow v. E-470 Public Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Carousel Farms Metro. Dist. v. Woodcrest Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Bear Creek Development Corp. v. Genesee FoundationColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
- Silver Dollar Metropolitan District v. GoltraColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- GLENELK ASS'N, INC. v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.