Haver v. Matonock
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Allen
This is a proceeding under the Eminent Domain Act. It was instituted by the filing of a petition in the district court of Pueblo county wherein it is alleged that the petitioners own tracts of land in the town of Rye, in Pueblo county, which can be supplied with water from “Zorn Arroya” which is described as “a tributary of Graneros Creek, a tributary of Greenhorn Creek, a tributary of the St. Charles River in Water District No. 15.” It is further alleged, among other things, that petitioners’ lands can be supplied with water through a pipe line laid across the land of the defendant, Paul…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Denver Power & Irrigation Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Gibson v. CannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
- Schneider v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
3Cited by8 opinions
- Public Service Co. v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Goldstein v. Denver Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Pine Martin Mining Co. v. Empire Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Thornton Development Authority v. UpahDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
- Mortensen v. MortensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.