Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Cann

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1901No. 4112PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Ihe District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

This action was commenced by appellant for the purpose of condemning a right of way for a ditch and land for reservoir sites across and on the lands of appellee, the waters thus conducted and conserved to be used for irrigation. A commission was appointed to ascertain the necessity for taking the lands sought to be condemned. On the issue of necessity, the cause was submitted to the commission upon the theory that in determining this question it was proper to consider the practicability and feasibility of obtaining water from sources from which it was intended to supply the ditch and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edgewood RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  2. Warner v. Town of GunnisonColorado Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. Colorado Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  2. Pine Martin Mining Co. v. Empire Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  3. Tanner v. Provo Bench Canal & Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Chicago, M. & St. P. R. v. MasonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Mortensen v. MortensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API