Legal Opinion
AK Steel Corp. v. Viacom, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 3, 2003PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTodd, J.
¶ 1 In this declaratory judgment action, AK Steel Corporation (“AK Steel”) and John Maneely Corporation (“Maneely”) appeal the Judgment entered April 22, 2002 by Order of the Mercer County Court of Common Pleas denying their post-trial motion and entering judgment in favor of Viacom, Inc. (‘Viacom”). We affirm.
¶ 2 The events which led to the filing of this declaratory judgment action by Appellants were set forth by the trial court as follows:
By a deed dated July 23, 1986, Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“Westinghouse”) conveyed to Cyclops Corporation certain property located in Sharon,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seven Springs Farm, Inc. v. CrokerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- O'BRIEN v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Binenstock TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- FLATLEY BY FLATLEY v. PenmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- General Dynamics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re ScheidmantelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Universal Underwriters Insurance v. A. Richard Kacin, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Whole Enchilada, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2008
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Carl A. Joseph & Octavia Joseph Appeal JosephSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.