Legal Opinion

In Re Scheidmantel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 5, 2005PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

HUDOCK, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order sustaining the grant of a surcharge and confirming as absolute the final account filed in this case. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.

¶ 2 In 1998, Stella N. Scheidmantel (Grantor) executed an instrument of trust creating a revocable inter vivos trust titled the “Stella N. Scheidmantel Living Trust dated July 29, 1998” (the Trust, or the Scheidmantel Trust). See Declaration of Trust, 7/29/98, at 14 (Article Seventeenth) (defining “short name” of the Trust). The Scheidmantel Trust named as trustee…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. HugginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Werner v. Plater-ZyberkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Albright v. Abington Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Martin-Mcfarlane v. City of Phila.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Commonwealth v. FaulkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Recreation Land Corp. v. HartzfeldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. In re Estate of RosengartenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API