Legal Opinion

Estill v. Cnty. of Shasta

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 31, 2018No. C077513PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMauro, Acting P. J.

*193*705Renee Estill submitted a government claim against the County of Shasta and others, specifically representing that she first became aware of the alleged incident on September 9, 2011. The County *706accepted Estill's representation and denied her claim on the merits. Because it accepted the claim as timely, the County did not warn Estill to seek leave to present a late claim. This lawsuit followed.

During Estill's deposition, however, defendants learned she was aware of the alleged wrongdoing as early as 2009. The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment primarily on the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 1041 20TH St., LLC v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Lund v. DatzmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  3. Roger v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Scally v. PetSmart LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  5. Tayyar v. E&N Financial Services & Development, Inc. CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API