Pekera v. Purpora
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*687 Opinion
PETERS, J.
In this case, the prolonged refusal of a hospital patient to consent to a medical procedure called endotrachial intubation1 resulted in her death. A malpractice complaint alleged that an attending pulmo-nologist negligently had performed and managed the patient’s intubation. The principal issue is whether this complaint should be construed to encompass an allegation that the pulmonologist had failed to inform the patient of the risk of death if she was not immediately intubated. Concluding that such a construction was improper, the trial court granted the pulmonologist’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hammer v. Mount Sinai HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Ryan Transportation, Inc. v. M & G AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hayes v. CamelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Anderson v. SchoenhornConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Pekera v. PurporaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Peckham v. Idaho State Board of DentistryIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.