Legal Opinion

Peckham v. Idaho State Board of Dentistry

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2013No. 39758PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

The Board of Dentistry (the “Board”) fined a dentist for failing to adequately inform one of his patients before performing a procedure, and for publishing misleading advertising on his website. The district court affirmed the Board’s decision, and the dentist appealed to this Court. We reverse because there was insufficient evidence to support the Board’s conclusions.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

Since 1986, Lon N. Peckham, D.M.D, has been licensed by the Board as a general dentist. At all relevant times he operated a solo practice called AIRO…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Canesi Ex Rel. Canesi v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Wheeler v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Pearl v. BPD OF IDAHO STATE BD. OF MEDICINEIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hawkins v. Bonneville County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pines, D.O. v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Hauser Lake Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. City of HauserIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API