Legal Opinion
Ryan Transportation, Inc. v. M & G Associates
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 4, 2003No. SC 16923PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The plaintiff, Ryan Transportation, Inc., commenced this action against its commercial coten-ant, the defendant, Auto Lock Unlimited, Inc. (Auto Lock), and its landlord, the named defendant, M and G Associates (M & G),1 seeking damages for losses *522sustained as a result of a fire, set by an unknown arsonist, that destroyed a building that Auto Lock and the plaintiff occupied. The plaintiff alleged in its complaint that both Auto Lock and M & G knew of an earlier, unsuccessful attempt to set the building on fire and negligently failed to notify the plaintiff about it. The trial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Sarah B. Kline v. 1500 Massachusetts Avenue Apartment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Waters v. AutuoriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Gazo v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Nazami v. Patrons Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hayes v. CamelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Murdock v. CroughwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Desrosiers v. HenneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Prentice v. Dalco Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.