Legal Opinion

Monsma v. Williams

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1963No. 277PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

This is a tort action brought to recover damages for injuries alleged by the plaintiff' to have been received in the course of an: attempted rape and sexual assault upon her by the defendant. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed. The principal questions presented by this appeal relate to> the trial court’s findings of fact.

On a night in September of 1961, the; plaintiff and the defendant met in an Anchorage bar where they engaged in conversation and had a drink together. Between one and two o’clock in the morning the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spain v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Reynolds v. DonohoWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. CHIRIKOFF ISLAND CATTLE CORPORATION v. RobinetteAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In Re Kraft's EstateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Watson v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. NiziolekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Leavitt v. GillaspieAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Preferred General Agency of Alaska, Inc. v. RaffettoAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API