Legal Opinion

Angers v. Sabatinelli

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Despite the fact that on the former appeal this court after making a careful analysis of plaintiff’s complaint pointed out that the complaint stated a good cause of action for declaratory relief under sec. 269.56, Stats., and no other and that the only defendants against whom such a cause of action is stated are, (1) the creditors of the Cream City Wrecking Company, and (2) the Nelli Wrecking Company, his immediate grantor, by his third amended complaint the plaintiff still insists that he has stated a good cause of action in equity against respondents.

The first contention made upon this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scharine v. HuebschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Rebholz v. WettengelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Marshall v. WittigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Luebke v. City of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Harnischfeger Sales Corp. v. Kehrein Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Puttkammer v. MinthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Dodge v. Carri-Craft, Inc., Div. of Wis. Tanktainer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
  4. A C Storage Co. v. Madison Moving & Wrecking Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. O'BRIEN v. HessmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API