Legal Opinion

O'BRIEN v. Hessman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1962PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The appellant contends that the disposition of the 1952 action does not preclude the present litigation. The respondent maintains that the judgment dismissing the 1952 complaint on its merits is a bar to the present action.

Generally, a prior adjudication is a bar to a subsequent action involving the same parties and the same cause of action. This is the doctrine of res judicata. See Will of Nunnemacher (1939), 230 Wis. 93, 283 N. W. 326, and Rahr v. Wittmann (1911), 147 Wis. 195, 132 N. W. 1107. See also Restatement, Judgments, p. 191, sec. 48, and Charles, Res Adjudicata and Estoppel by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rahr v. WittmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Ellis v. Northern Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Docter v. FurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Taylor v. MattesonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Angers v. SabatinelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Casey v. Palmer Johnson Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Dodge v. Carri-Craft, Inc., Div. of Wis. Tanktainer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
  3. A C Storage Co. v. Madison Moving & Wrecking Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Estate of RadocayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Omernick v. LaRocqueDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API