Legal Opinion

Blake v. Blake

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 22, 1969No. 6911DC486PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

On this appeal we are concerned solely with the sufficiency of the order awarding the defendant wife alimony pendente lite and counsel fees in her cross action to her husband’s suit for divorce. Plaintiff appellant, by appropriate assignments of error, challenges the trial court’s order on the grounds that (1) it is not supported by pleadings, affidavits, stipulated facts, or findings of fact; and (2) the court abused its discretion. The order appealed from recites that the defendant “offered evidence to support her claim for alimony pendente lite and counsel fees.” The only reference to this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Price v. . PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Deal v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Creech v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Peoples v. PeoplesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Sprinkle v. SprinkleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Gardner v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. US Piping, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API