Legal Opinion
Fastship, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 2, 2015No. 12-484CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Patent ease; “manufactured” for purposes of alleged infringement under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a); partial summary judgment
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
In this patent case, plaintiff, FastShip LLC (“FastShip”), alleges that the United States (“the government”) through the Department of the Navy (“the Navy”) has infringed Claims 1 and 19 of its U.S. Patent No. 5,080,032 (“the ’032 patent”) and Claims 1, 3, 5, and 7 of its U.S. Patent No. 5,231,946 (“the ’946 patent”) and thus is liable for damages under 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a). Compl. ¶ 18. FastShip claims patent infringement regarding the Freedom…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fastship, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Floyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Fastship, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.