Legal Opinion

State v. Leffingwell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1977No. 7712SC322PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court, upon request, to charge the jury as follows: “The burden to overcome the presumption of innocence rests upon the government. The failure of any defendant to testify does not create any presumption of guilt against him. The defendant is never required to prove his innocence.” The defendant offered evidence by several witnesses but he did not testify. Thus, this assignment of error raises the question of whether a non-testifying defendant has the indefeasible right, upon proper request, to have the court tell the jury in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. State v. BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. . SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API